1: \begin{abstract}

2:  Robotic collectives are large groups ($\ge50$) of locally sensing and communicating robots that encompass characteristics of swarms and colonies, whose emergent behaviors accomplish complex tasks.  Future human-collective teams will extend the ability of operators to monitor, respond, and make decisions in disaster response, search and rescue, and environmental monitoring problems.  This manuscript evaluates two collective best-of-$n$ decision models for enabling collectives to identify and choose the highest valued target  from a finite set of $n$ targets.  Two challenges impede the future use of human-collective shared decisions:  1) environmental bias reduces collective decision accuracy when poorer targets are easier to evaluate than higher quality targets, and 2) little is understood about shared human-collective decision making interaction strategies.  The two evaluated collective best-of-$n$ models include an existing insect colony decision model and an extended bias-reducing model that attempts to reduce environmental bias in order to improve accuracy.  Collectives using these two strategies are compared independently and as members of human-collective teams.  Independently, the extended model is slower than the original model, but the extended algorithm is 57\% more accurate in decisions where the optimal option is more difficult to evaluate.  Human-collective teams using the bias-reducing model require less operator influence and achieve 25\% higher accuracy with difficult decisions, than the human-collective teams using the original model.  Further, a novel human-collective interaction strategy enables operators to adjust collective autonomy while making multiple simultaneous decisions.  

3:   

4: \end{abstract}

5: