1: \begin{abstract}

2: We investigate the possible origin of hierarchical structures in

3: complex systems describable in terms of a finite and small number of

4: parameters which control the behavioral pattern at each level of

5: organization. We argue that the limitation on the number of

6: important parameters at each stage is a reflection of the fact that

7: Thom's classification of catastrophes, i.e., qualitative changes,

8: involve only a few parameters. In addition, we also point out that

9: even in systems with a large number of components, only a few may be

10: of statistically great significance, just as in Zipf's law the

11: quantitative measure of the important collections is inversely

12: proportional to the rank. We then consider the concept of relative

13: degeneracies coming from change of resolving power, at various

14: scales, which too would vindicate the procedure of coarse-graining

15: in building up hierarchical organizations. We suggest that, similar

16: to the group-theoretical annihilation of dangling tensor indices due

17: to symmetry to minimize energy, even in more inexact contexts such

18: as in biology and the social sciences, similar attempts by the

19: system to reduce frustration may lead to cluster formation, which

20: are semi-closed, and let leakage interactions come into play at

21: larger scales.

22: 

23: \vspace{0.5cm}

24: 

25: \noindent {\bf Keyword:} complex systems; structural organization;

26: control parameters.

27: 

28: \noindent {\bf PACS nos.:}  89.75.Fb,  05.43.-a, 02.50.Le, 02.40.Vh

29: \end{abstract}

30: