1: \begin{abstract}

2: I consider the effect on MSTW partons distribution functions (PDFs)

3: due to changes in the choices of theoretical procedure used in the fit. 

4: I first consider using the 3-flavour fixed flavour number scheme instead 

5: of the standard general mass variable flavour number scheme used in the 

6: MSTW analysis. This results in the light quarks increasing at all relatively 

7: small $x$ values, the gluon distribution becoming smaller at high values of 

8: $x$ and larger at small $x$, the preferred value of the coupling constant 

9: $\alpha_S(M_Z^2)$ falling, particularly at NNLO, and the fit quality 

10: deteriorates. I also consider lowering the kinematic

11: cut on $W^2$ for DIS data and simultaneously 

12: introducing higher twist terms which are fit

13: to data. This results in much smaller effects  

14: on both PDFs and

15: $\alpha_S(M_Z^2)$ than the scheme change, except for quarks at very high $x$. 

16: I show that the structure function one obtains from a fixed input set of PDFs 

17: using the fixed flavour scheme and variable flavour scheme differ

18: significantly for $x \sim 0.01$ at high $Q^2$, and that this is due 

19: to the fact that in the fixed flavour scheme there is a slow convergence 

20: of large logarithmic terms of the form $(\alpha_S\ln(Q^2/m_c^2))^n$ 

21: relevant for this 

22: regime. I conclude that some of the most significant differences in PDF

23: sets are largely due to the choice of flavour scheme used.

24: \end{abstract}