1: \begin{proof}

2: %The calculation is analogous to \eqref{eq:aofr-explicit-secondproof}. 

3: %Recalling the duplication formula \eqref{eq:duplication-formula} and the reflection formula \cite[p.~9]{andrews-askey-roy}

4: %\begin{equation}

5: %\label{eq:reflection-formula}

6: %\Gamma(z)\Gamma(1-z) =\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi z)},

7: %\end{equation}

8: %we have that

9: %\begin{align*}

10: %\int_0^\infty B(r) r^{s-1}\,dr &=

11: %\int_0^\infty \int_0^\infty \nu(x) e^{-\pi x r^2}\,dx \, r^{s-1}\,dr

12: %\\ &=

13: %\int_0^\infty \nu(x)  \int_0^\infty  e^{-\pi x r^2} r^{s-1}\,dr\,dx

14: %\\ &=

15: %\int_0^\infty \nu(x)

16: %\left(

17: %\int_0^\infty e^{-u} \left(\frac{\sqrt{u}}{\sqrt{\pi x}}\right)^{s-1}\, \frac{du}{2 \sqrt{\pi x u}}

18: %\right)

19: %\,dx

20: %\\ &=

21: %\frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}} \pi^{-(s-1)/2} \Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)

22: %\int_0^\infty \nu(x) x^{-s/2}\,dx

23: %\\ &= 

24: %\frac12 \pi^{-s/2} \Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)

25: %\int_0^\infty \nu(x) x^{(2-s)/2-1}\,dx

26: %\\ & =

27: %\frac12 \pi^{-s/2} \Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)

28: %\cdot \frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi}} 

29: %\Gamma\left(\frac{2-s}{2}\right)\Gamma\left(\frac32-\frac{2-s}{2}\right) \xi(2-s-1)

30: %\\ & =

31: %\pi^{-(s+1)/2} \Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right)

32: %\Gamma\left(1-\frac{s}{2}\right)\Gamma\left(\frac{s+1}{2}\right) \xi(s)

33: %\\ & =

34: %\pi^{-(s+1)/2}

35: %\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi s/2)}

36: %\Gamma\left(\frac{s+1}{2}\right) \frac12 s(s-1)\pi^{-s/2} \Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right) \zeta(s)

37: %\\ & =

38: %\frac12 

39: %\frac{\pi^{1/2-s}}{\sin(\pi s/2)}

40: % s(s-1) \zeta(s)\cdot 2^{1-s} \sqrt{\pi} \Gamma(s)

41: %\\ & =

42: %\frac{(2\pi)^{1-s}}{2\sin(\pi s/2)}

43: % s(s-1) \Gamma(s) \zeta(s),

44: %\end{align*}

45: %as claimed. The rigorous justification of the above steps under the assumption $0<\re(s)<2$ is similar to the one given in Proposition~\ref{prop:mellin-nu}.

46: %\end{proof}

47: