1: \begin{abstract}

2: Bayesian inference involves two main computational challenges. First,

3: in estimating the parameters of some model for the data, the posterior

4: distribution may well be highly multi-modal: a regime in which the

5: convergence to stationarity of traditional Markov Chain Monte Carlo

6: (MCMC) techniques becomes incredibly slow. Second, in selecting

7: between a set of competing models the necessary estimation of the

8: Bayesian evidence for each is, by definition, a (possibly

9: high-dimensional) integration over the entire parameter space; again

10: this can be a daunting computational task, although new Monte Carlo

11: (MC) integration algorithms offer solutions of ever increasing

12: efficiency.  Nested sampling (NS) is one such contemporary MC strategy

13: targeted at calculation of the Bayesian evidence, but which also

14: enables posterior inference as a by-product, thereby allowing

15: simultaneous parameter estimation and model selection. The widely-used

16: {\sc MultiNest} algorithm presents a particularly efficient

17: implementation of the NS technique for multi-modal posteriors. In this

18: paper we discuss importance nested sampling (INS), an alternative

19: summation of the {\sc MultiNest} draws, which can calculate the

20: Bayesian evidence at up to an order of magnitude higher accuracy than

21: `vanilla' NS with no change in the way {\sc MultiNest} explores the

22: parameter space. This is accomplished by treating as a

23: (pseudo-)importance sample the totality of points collected by {\sc

24: MultiNest}, including those previously discarded under the constrained

25: likelihood sampling of the NS algorithm. We apply this technique to

26: several challenging test problems and compare the accuracy of Bayesian

27: evidences obtained with INS against those from vanilla NS.

28: 

29: 

30: 

31: \end{abstract}

32: