1: \begin{abstract}

2: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming diverse societal domains,

3: raising critical questions about its risks and benefits and the

4: misalignments between public expectations and academic visions. This

5: study examines how the general public (N=1110)---people using or being

6: affected by AI---and academic AI experts (N=119)---people shaping AI

7: development---perceive AI's capabilities and impact across 71 scenarios,

8: including sustainability, healthcare, job performance, societal divides,

9: art, and warfare. Participants evaluated each scenario on four

10: dimensions: expected probability, perceived risk and benefit, and

11: overall sentiment (or value). The findings reveal significant

12: quantitative differences: experts anticipate higher probabilities,

13: perceive lower risks, report greater utility, and express more favorable

14: sentiment toward AI compared to the non-experts. Notably, risk-benefit

15: tradeoffs differ: the public assigns risk half the weight of benefits,

16: while experts assign it only a third. Visual maps of these evaluations

17: highlight areas of convergence and divergence, identifying potential

18: sources of public concern. These insights offer actionable guidance for

19: researchers and policymakers to align AI development with societal

20: values, fostering public trust and informed governance.

21: \end{abstract}

22: