1: \begin{abstract}

2:   This paper offers a qualitative insight into the convergence of

3:   Bayesian parameter inference in a setup which mimics the modeling of

4:   the spread of a disease with associated disease

5:   measurements. Specifically, we are interested in the Bayesian

6:   model's convergence with increasing amounts of data under

7:   measurement limitations. Depending on how weakly informative the

8:   disease measurements are, we offer a kind of `best case' as well as

9:   a `worst case' analysis where, in the former case, we assume that

10:   the prevalence is directly accessible, while in the latter that only

11:   a binary signal corresponding to a prevalence detection threshold is

12:   available. Both cases are studied under an assumed so-called linear

13:   noise approximation as to the true dynamics. Numerical experiments

14:   test the sharpness of our results when confronted with more

15:   realistic situations for which analytical results are unavailable.

16: \end{abstract}

17: