63ff39002b72cfbd.tex
1: \begin{definition}
2:   \label{def:non-branching}
3:   It follows from Theorem \ref{thm:non-branching} that we can
4:   associate with $\sttilt A$ an \emph{exchange graph} whose
5:   vertices are basic support $\tau$-tilting $A$-modules and there
6:   is an edge between two non-isomorphic support $\tau$-tilting
7:   $A$-modules $M$ and $N$ if and only if the following
8:   holds:
9:   \begin{itemize}
10:   \item There exists an idempotent $e\in A$ such that
11:     $M,N\in\mod(A/\langle e\rangle)$.
12:   \item There exists an almost-complete $\tau$-tilting
13:     $(A/\langle e\rangle)$-module $U$ such that $U\in\add M$ and
14:     $U\in\add N$.
15:   \end{itemize}
16:   In this case we say that $M$ and $N$ are obtained from each
17:   other by mutation.
18:   Note that this exchange graph is $n$-regular, where $|A|=n$ is
19:   the number of simple $A$-modules.
20:   It is shown in \cite[Cor. 2.31]{adachi_tau-tilting_2012} that
21:   the underlying graph of $Q(\sttilt A)$ coincides with the
22:   exchange graph of $\sttilt A$.
23: \end{definition}
24: