1: \begin{abstract}

2: Models of tumor growth,  now commonly used, present several levels

3: of complexity, both in terms of the biomedical ingredients and the

4: mathematical description. The simplest ones contain competition for

5: space using  purely fluid mechanical concepts. Another possible

6: ingredient is the supply of nutrients through vasculature. The

7: models can describe the tissue either at the level of cell

8: densities, or at the scale of the solid tumor, in this latter

9: case by means of a free boundary problem.

10: 

11: 

12: Our first goal here is to formulate a free boundary model of

13: Hele-Shaw type, a variant including growth terms,  starting from the

14: description at the cell level and passing to a certain limit. A

15: detailed mathematical analysis of this purely mechanical model is

16: performed. Indeed, we are able to prove strong convergence in

17: passing to the limit, with various uniform gradient estimates; we

18: also prove uniqueness for the asymptotic Hele-Shaw type problem. The

19: main tools are nonlinear  regularizing effects for certain porous

20: medium type equations, regularization techniques \`a la Steklov,

21: and a Hilbert duality method for uniqueness. At variance with the

22: classical Hele-Shaw problem, here the geometric motion governed by

23: the pressure is not sufficient to completely describe the dynamics.

24: A complete description requires the equation on the cell number

25: density.

26: 

27: 

28: Using this theory as a basis, we go on to consider the more complex

29: model including nutrients.  We obtain the equation for the limit of

30: the coupled system; the method relies on some

31: BV bounds and space/time a priori estimates. Here, new technical

32: difficulties appear, and they reduce the generality of the results

33: in terms of the initial data. Finally, we prove uniqueness for the system,

34: a main mathematical difficulty.

35: 

36: 

37: \end{abstract}

38: