1: \begin{proof} Part (A) is clear.  For Part (B), it is clear by continuity 

2: that there is an $\epsilon_v > 0$

3: the existence of an $\epsilon_v > 0$ for which (\ref{FMZ2}) holds is essentially trivial by continuity 

4: but will rigorously shown in Lemma \ref{DLemCP1B} below).

5: that there is an $\epsilon_v > 0$ such that if $|\eta_{v,ij}|_v < \epsilon_v$ 

6: for each $i, j$ then 

7: \begin{eqnarray*} 

8: \{ z : |\hF_v(z)|_v \le \hR_v^{n_v N} \}

9:  & \subset & \{ z : |\phi_v(z)^{n_v}|_v \le R_v^{n_v N} \} \\

10:  & = & \{ z  : |\phi_v(z)|_v \le R_v^N \}  \ \subset \ E_v^0 \ . 

11: \end{eqnarray*} 

12: \end{proof}