1: \begin{abstract}

2:   A well-known question by Gromov asks whether the vanishing of the

3:   simplicial volume of oriented closed aspherical manifolds

4:   implies the vanishing of the Euler characteristic.

5:   

6:   We study various versions of Gromov's question and collect

7:   strategies towards affirmative answers and strategies towards

8:   negative answers to this problem. Moreover, we put Gromov's question

9:   into context with other open problems in low- and high-dimensional

10:   topology.

11: 

12:   A special emphasis is put on a comparative analysis of the

13:   additivity properties of the simplicial volume and the Euler

14:   characteristic for manifolds with boundary. We explain that the

15:   simplicial volume defines a symmetric monoidal functor (TQFT) on the \emph{amenable} cobordism category, but not on the

16:   whole cobordism category.  In addition, using known computations of

17:   simplicial volumes, we conclude that the fundamental group of the

18:   $4$-dimensional amenable cobordism category is not finitely

19:   generated.

20: 

21:   We also consider new variations of Gromov's question. Specifically,

22:   we show that counterexamples exist among aspherical spaces that are

23:   only homology equivalent to oriented closed connected manifolds.

24: \end{abstract}

25: