1: \begin{proof} It suffices to prove the convergence for $ \PP^{(N,K)} \big( x_1(t) \big)$. Since $\xi_{ij}$ is in the domain of attraction of $\Psi_\alpha$ and $x_\xi = 0$, for every $z > 0$, 

2: \begin{equation} \label{eq:ousertattraction}

3: \P \left( \xi_{ \sigma_1(t) j} (t) > -z a_N \right)  \sim z^{\alpha} \P \left( \xi_{ \sigma_1(t) j} (t) > - a_N \right)  \sim \frac{z^{\alpha}}{N}  \qquad \quad \text{ as } N \to \infty.

4: \end{equation}

5: It is a classical result of extreme value theory  \cite{Resnick1987}  that, as $N \to \infty$, the point process 

6: $$

7: \PP^{(N,K)} \stackrel{\rm law}{=}\sum_{j =1}^{N-KM} \delta_{ \left\{ a_N^{-1} \xi_{1, j } (t) \right\} }.

8: $$

9: converges in distribution to a PPP with intensity measure $|z|^{\alpha-1} \alpha \textbf{1}_{\{z < 0\}}  \text{d}z$, as claimed.

10: A necessary and sufficient condition for the convergence of the $\ell$th moment is that the r.v. $\xi_{ij}$ has itself finite $\ell$th moment, which is a consequence of \ref{first_hypotesis}. Proposition~2.1 in \cite{Resnick1987} proves this statement for the maxima of i.i.d. random variables in the domain of attraction of $\Psi_\alpha$. 

11: %Although it seems a classical result in extreme value theory, we have not found in the literature any proof concerning the moment convergence of the $K$th maxima. Yet, a rigorous proof can be obtained by a line-by-line adaptation of Proposition~2.1 in \cite{Resnick1987}. For this reason, we decide to omit this proof and leave the details to the reader. 

12: 

13: Now, a line-by-line adaptation of Proposition~2.1 in \cite{Resnick1987} yields the last claim. 

14: \end{proof}

15: