67d3211dcc103572.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: In this paper we present a modified localization landscape theory to
3: calculate localized/confined electron and hole states and the
4: corresponding energy eigenvalues without solving a (large)
5: eigenvalue problem. We motivate and demonstrate the benefit of
6: solving $\hat{H}^2u=1$ in the modified localization landscape theory
7: in comparison to $\hat{H}u=1$, solved in the localization landscape
8: theory. We detail the advantages by fully analytic considerations
9: before targeting the numerical calculation of electron and hole
10: states and energies in III-N heterostructures. We further discuss
11: how the solution of $\hat{H}^2u=1$ is used to extract an effective
12: potential $W$ that is comparable to the effective potential obtained
13: from $\hat{H}u=1$, ensuring that it can for instance be used to
14: introduce quantum corrections to drift-diffusion transport
15: calculations. Overall, we show that the proposed modified
16: localization landscape theory keeps all the benefits of the recently
17: introduced localization landscape theory but further improves
18: factors such as convergence of the calculated energies and the
19: robustness of the method against the chosen integration region for
20: $u$ to obtain the corresponding energies. We find that this becomes
21: especially important for here studied $c$-plane InGaN/GaN quantum
22: wells with higher In contents. All these features make the proposed
23: approach very attractive for calculation of localized states in
24: highly disordered systems, where partitioning the systems into
25: different subregions can be difficult.
26: 
27: \end{abstract}
28: