1: \begin{abstract} 

2: % %---------------------------------- original version -------------------

3: % This paper extends the neural network significance test framework by developing a more general approach based on scale-insensitive complexity measures. We replace the metric entropy-based analysis with Rademacher complexity bounds, enabling the handling of unbounded network weights and general activation functions while maintaining statistical rigor. The theoretical foundations are established through three key innovations: (i) a modified sieve space construction based on linear combinations of neural networks with second moment bounds rather than weight constraints, (ii) a localization technique for handling unbounded weights, and (iii) new consistency and asymptotic distribution results using empirical process theory. Our framework relaxes several key assumptions: the binary tree visual structure is replaced with weaker moment conditions, the Sobolev space requirement is reduced to $s > d/2$, and the activation function need only be Lipschitz continuous. We prove that under these weaker conditions, the least squares estimator maintains optimal convergence rates, and the test statistic converges to a well-defined limiting distribution. The proofs employ modern empirical process theory, using Rademacher complexity for both upper bounds and asymptotic analysis, providing a more direct route to establishing the asymptotic properties of the test statistic while accommodating contemporary neural network architectures.

4: 

5: % \end{abstract}

6: