1: \begin{abstract}

2:     I have reanalyzed the data obtained for local ($z<0.15$) star-forming galaxies during the pilot survey for the Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX)---called the HETDEX Pilot Survey (HPS)---which uses an integral-field-unit spectrograph and covers $\sim3500-5800$ \AA{} at $\sim5$ \AA{} resolution.

3:     I have newly determined the gas metallicities, \metal, following the Bayesian analysis scheme of the previous study, but dealing carefully with the uncertainty of strong-line calibration, performing reproducibility tests with mock data, and monitoring the convergence of the \mcmc{} (MCMC) sampling.

4:     From the mock-data tests, I found that the nebular emission-line color excess \EBV{} can be overestimated by as much as 2-$\sigma$ or more, although the metallicity can recover the input value to within 1-$\sigma$.

5:     The new metallicity estimates on the HPS data are from well-converged MCMC samples (effective sample sizes $>$ 2000), and they are higher than the previous estimates by $\sim$2-$\sigma$.

6:     Using the HPS data, I also showed that the MCMC sampling can have the statistical accuracy as poor as the one near the iteration start if done without convergence monitoring.

7:     The overestimation of \EBV{} indicates the overestimation of the star-formation rates (SFRs) in the previous study, which can be as much as a factor of five.

8:     This finding undermines the previous suggestion of a hitherto-unknown galaxy population based on the locations of galaxies in the mass-SFR plane.

9:     I found that the independent determination of \EBV{} using either \Hb-\Hg{} or \Ha-\Hb{} line pair is ideal for the analysis of forthcoming HETDEX data, but it requires additional cost.

10:     % ---reducing the number of target galaxies (\Hb-\Hg{} pair) or requiring another follow-up observation (\Ha-\Hb{} pair).

11: \end{abstract}

12: