1: \begin{abstract}

2: {\footnotesize{}We show that the  limiting distribution of HAR test

3: statistics under fixed-$b$ asymptotics is not pivotal when the data

4: are nonstationarity. It takes the form of a complicated function of

5: Gaussian processes and depends on the second moments of the relevant

6: series (e.g., of the regressors and errors for the case of the linear

7: regression model). Hence, existing fixed-$b$ inference methods based

8: on stationarity are not theoretically valid in general. The nuisance

9: parameters entering the fixed-$b$ limiting distribution can be consistently

10: estimated under small-$b$ asymptotics but only with nonparametric

11: rate of convergence. We show that the error in rejection probability

12: (ERP) is an order of magnitude larger than that under stationarity

13: and is also larger than that of HAR tests based on HAC estimators

14: under conventional asymptotics. These theoretical results reconcile

15: with recent finite-sample evidence  showing that fixed-$b$ HAR tests

16: can perform poorly when the data are nonstationary. They can be conservative

17: under the null hypothesis and have non-monotonic power under the alternative

18: hypothesis irrespective of how large the sample size is. }{\footnotesize\par}

19: \end{abstract}