6c9ca3ebb957e4ce.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: The Procrustes distance is used to quantify the similarity or dissimilarity of (3-dimensional)
3: shapes, and extensively used in biological morphometrics. Typically each (normalized) shape
4: is represented by $N$ landmark points, chosen to be homologous (i.e. corresponding to each other), as much as possible, and the Procrustes
5: distance is then computed as $\inf_{R}\,\sum_{j=1}^N\, \|Rx_j-x'_j\|^2$, where the minimization is over all Euclidean transformations, and the correspondences $x_j \leftrightarrow x'_j$
6: are picked in an optimal way. \\
7: This (discrete)
8: Procrustes distance is easy to compute but 
9: has drawbacks -- representeding a shape by only a finite number of
10: points, which may fail to capture all the geometric aspects of interest; a need has been expressed
11: for alternatives that
12: are still computationally tractable.
13: We propose in this paper the concept of 
14: %{\large
15: {\bf {continuous Procrustes distance}}, and prove that it provides a true metric
16: for two-dimensional surfaces embedded in three dimensions. The continuous Procrustes 
17: distance leads to a hard optimization
18: problem over the group of area-preserving diffeomorphisms. One of the core 
19: observations of our paper is that for small continuous Procrustes distances, 
20: the global optimum of the Procrustes distance can be uniformly approximated 
21: by a conformal map. This observation leads to an
22: efficient algorithm to calculate approximations to this new distance.
23: \end{abstract}