1: \begin{abstract}

2: % %\boldmat

3: % In recent years, various Lattice Boltzmann models for electrodynamics have been developed as alternatives to classical methods such as Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) and Finite Element Methods (FEM). However, there has been a lack of systematic comparisons between these models. This paper addresses this gap by comparing two specific Lattice Boltzmann models.

4: 

5: % The first model, proposed by M. Mendoza and D. Muñoz in 2010, is well-known in this field. The second model, initially proposed by A. Hauser and L. Verhey, was modified by the authors of this paper to include the current in the collision term. Both models simulate the Maxwell's equations, including sources, and tend to preserve conservation laws while taking advantage of parallelization on GPUs.

6: 

7: % To compare the models, we utilize time and memory as indicators, considering the same achieved error, in four standard tests: a dielectric pulse traveling through two interfaces, the skin effect, the Hertz dipole, and a dielectric pulse traveling through several interfaces.

8: 

9: % The results indicate that both methods accurately simulate the tests and exhibit convergence as the mesh is refined. However, the X method outperforms the Y method in terms of time and memory efficiency. The modified Hauser-Verhey model demonstrates itself to be a promising alternative to the Mendoza-Muñoz model. These findings contribute to the ongoing development and optimization of numerical methods for electromagnetics simulations.

10: % \end{abstract}

11: