1: \begin{abstract}

2: We analyze a novel multi-level version

3: of a recently introduced compressed sensing (CS) 

4: Petrov-Galerkin (PG) method 

5: from 

6: [H. Rauhut and Ch. Schwab:

7: Compressive sensing {P}etrov-{G}alerkin approximation of

8: high-dimensional parametric operator equations,

9: Math. Comp. {\bf 304}(2017) 661--700]

10: for the solution of many-parametric partial differential equations. 

11: We propose to use multi-level PG discretizations, based on a hierarchy of nested 

12: finite dimensional subspaces, and to reconstruct parametric solutions 

13: at each level from level-dependent

14: random samples of the high-dimensional parameter space via CS methods such 

15: as weighted $\ell_1$-minimization.

16: For affine parametric, linear operator equations, we prove that

17: our approach allows to approximate the parametric solution

18: with (almost) optimal convergence order as specified by certain summability 

19: properties of the coefficient sequence in a general polynomial chaos expansion 

20: of the parametric solution and by the convergence order of the 

21: PG discretization in the physical variables.

22: The computations of the parameter samples of the PDE solution

23: is ``embarrasingly parallel'', as in Monte-Carlo Methods.

24: Contrary to other recent approaches, and as already noted in 

25: [A. Doostan and H. Owhadi:

26: A non-adapted sparse approximation of PDEs with stochastic inputs. 

27: JCP {\bf 230}(2011) 3015-3034]

28: the optimality of the computed approximations does not require a-priori assumptions

29: on ordering and structure of the index sets of 

30: the largest gpc coefficients 

31: (such as the ``downward closed'' property).

32: We prove that under certain assumptions work versus accuracy of the new algorithms 

33: is asymptotically equal to that of one PG solve 

34: for the corresponding nominal problem on the finest discretization level up to a constant. 

35: \end{abstract}

36: