1: \begin{abstract}

2: 	A subgroup of $\mathrm{Homeo}_+(\mathbb{S}^1)$ is M\"obius-like if every element is conjugate to an element of $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{R})$. In general, a M\"obius-like subgroup of $\mathrm{Homeo}_+(\mathbb{S}^1)$ is not necessarily (semi-)conjugate to a subgroup of $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{R})$, as discovered by N. Kova\v{c}evi\'{c} [Trans.\ Amer.\ Math.\ Soc.\ \textbf{351} (1999), 4823--4835].

3: 	Here we determine simple dynamical criteria for the existence of such a (semi-)conjugacy.

4: 	We show that M\"obius-like subgroups of $\mathrm{Homeo}_+(\mathbb{S}^1)$ which are elementary (namely, preserving a Borel probability measure), are semi-conjugate to subgroups of $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{R})$.

5: 	On the other hand, we provide an example of elementary subgroup of $\mathrm{Diff}^\infty_+(\mathbb{S}^1)$ satisfying that every non-trivial element fixes at most 2 points, which is not isomorphic to any subgroup of $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{R})$. Finally, we show that non-elementary, non-locally discrete subgroups acting with at most $N$ fixed points are conjugate to a dense subgroup of some finite central extension of $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb{R})$.

6: 	

7: 		\smallskip

8: 	

9: 	\noindent {\footnotesize \textbf{MSC 2020:} Primary 37C85, 57M60. Secondary 37B05, 37E05.}

10: \end{abstract}