1: \begin{abstract}

2:   Interest in combinatorial interpretations of mathematical entities

3:   stems from the convenience of the concrete models they

4:   provide. Finding a bijective proof of a seemingly obscure identity

5:   can reveal unsuspected significance to it.  Finding a combinatorial

6:   model for some mathematical entity is a particular instance of the

7:   process called ``categorification''.  Examples include the

8:   interpretation of $\mathbbm{N}$ as the Burnside rig of the category

9:   of finite sets with product and coproduct, and the interpretation of

10:   $\mathbbm{N} [ x ]$ as the category of combinatorial species.  This

11:   has interesting applications to quantum mechanics, and in particular

12:   the quantum harmonic oscillator, via Joyal's ``species'', a new

13:   generalization called ``stuff types'', and operators between these,

14:   which can be represented as rudimentary Feynman diagrams for the

15:   oscillator.  In quantum mechanics, we want to represent states in an

16:   algebra over the complex numbers, and also want our Feynman diagrams

17:   to carry more structure than these ``stuff operators'' can do, and

18:   these turn out to be closely related.  We will show how to construct

19:   a combinatorial model for the quantum harmonic oscillator in which

20:   the group of phases, $U(1)$, plays a special role.  We describe a

21:   general notion of ``$M$-Stuff Types'' for any monoid $M$, and see

22:   that the case $M=U(1)$ provides an interpretation of time evolution

23:   in the combinatorial setting, as well as other quantum mechanical

24:   features of the harmonic oscillator.

25: \end{abstract}

26: