704c63b8d72a3bdf.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: 	\noindent The main drawback for the application of the conforming Argyris FEM is the labourious implementation on the one hand and the low convergence rates on the other.
3: If no appropriate adaptive meshes are utilised, only the convergence rate caused by corner singularities
4: %
5: [Blum and Rannacher, 1980],
6: far below the
7: approximation order for smooth functions, can be achieved.
8: The fine
9: approximation with the Argyris FEM produces high-dimensional linear systems and for a long time an optimal preconditioned
10: scheme was not available for unstructured
11: grids.
12: This paper presents numerical benchmarks to confirm that the adaptive multilevel solver for the hierarchical Argyris FEM from
13: %
14: [Carstensen and Hu, 2021] 
15: is in fact
16: highly efficient and of linear time complexity.
17: Moreover, the very first display of optimal convergence rates in practically relevant benchmarks with corner
18: singularities and general boundary conditions leads to the rehabilitation of the Argyris finite element from the
19: computational perspective.
20: %
21: %
22: \end{abstract}
23: