7160ec3e4a1842a0.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: We analyze how the choice of the sampling weight affects the efficiency of the
3: Monte Carlo evaluation of classical time autocorrelation functions. Assuming
4: uncorrelated sampling or sampling with constant correlation length, we propose
5: a sampling weight for which the number of trajectories needed for convergence
6: is independent of the correlated quantity, dimensionality, dynamics, and
7: phase-space density. In contrast, it is shown that the computational cost of
8: the \textquotedblleft standard\textquotedblright\ intuitive algorithm which
9: samples directly from the phase-space density may scale exponentially with the
10: number of degrees of freedom. Yet, for the stationary Gaussian distribution of
11: harmonic systems and for the autocorrelation function of a linear function of
12: phase-space coordinates, the computational cost of this standard algorithm is
13: also independent of dimensionality.
14: 
15: \end{abstract}