1: \begin{abstract}

2: We consider the problem of generating confidence intervals in randomized experiments with noncompliance. We show that a refinement of a randomization-based procedure proposed by Imbens and Rosenbaum (2005) has desirable properties. Namely, we show that using a studentized Anderson--Rubin-type statistic as a test statistic yields confidence intervals that are finite-sample exact under treatment effect homogeneity, and remain asymptotically valid for the Local Average Treatment Effect when the treatment effect is heterogeneous. We provide a uniform analysis of this procedure.

3: %We consider the problem of generating confidence intervals in randomized experiments with noncompliance. We show that a refinement of a randomization-based procedure proposed by Imbens and Rosenbaum (2005) has desirable properties. Namely, we show that use of a studentizied Anderson--Rubin-type statistic as a test statistic yields confidence intervals that (i) are finite-sample exact under treatment effect homogeneity, and (ii) remain asymptotically valid for the Local Average Treatment Effect when the treatment effect is heterogeneous. \textcolor{orange}{Our analysis supports the use of such randomization-based procedures in some cases with low compliance rates. }

4: %and (iii) have uniform \ber convergence \eer guarantees. % that do not require that the association between treatment encouragement and take-up be strong. 

5: %\ber In the case of two-sided noncompliance, this uniformity holds even for arbitrarily weak instruments.\eer 

6: %\textcolor{orange}{Haoge:I don't think we need to mention uniformity here.}

7: \end{abstract}

8: