73dd55686c869e2a.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: 	We present results from cross-correlating Planck CMB lensing maps with the Sloan Digital
3:     Sky Survey (SDSS) galaxy lensing shape
4: 	catalog and BOSS galaxy catalogs. For galaxy position vs.\ CMB lensing cross-correlations, we measure the
5:     convergence signal around the galaxies in
6: 	configuration space, using the BOSS LOWZ ($z\sim0.30$) and CMASS ($z\sim0.57$) samples. With fixed Planck 2015
7: 	cosmology, doing a
8: 	joint fit with the galaxy clustering measurement, for the LOWZ (CMASS) sample we find a galaxy
9:     bias $b_g=1.75\pm0.04$ ($1.95\pm 0.02$)
10:     and galaxy-matter cross-correlation
11:     coefficient $\cgm=1.0\pm0.2$ ($0.8\pm 0.1$) using $20<r_p<70\mpch$,
12:     consistent with results from galaxy-galaxy lensing. Using the same scales and including the
13:     galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, we constrain $\Omega_m=0.284\pm0.024$ and relative calibration bias between the
14:     CMB lensing and galaxy lensing to be $b_\gamma=0.82^{+0.15}_{-0.14}$. The combination of galaxy lensing and CMB
15:     lensing
16:     also allows us to measure the cosmological distance ratios (with $z_l\sim0.3$, $z_s\sim0.5$)
17:     $\mathcal R=\frac{D_s D_{l,*}}{D_* D_{l,s}}=2.68\pm0.29$, consistent with predictions from the
18:     Planck 2015 cosmology ($\mathcal R=2.35$).
19: 	We detect the galaxy position-CMB convergence cross-correlation
20:    	at small scales, $r_p<1\mpch$, and find consistency with lensing by NFW halos of mass $M_h\sim10^{13}$\hmsun.
21: 	Finally, we measure the CMB lensing-galaxy shear cross-correlation,
22: 	finding an amplitude of
23: 	$A=0.76\pm0.23$ ($z_\text{eff}=0.35$, $\theta<2^\circ$) with respect to Planck 2015 \lcdm\
24:     predictions ($1\sigma$-level consistency).
25: 	We do not find evidence for relative systematics between the CMB and SDSS galaxy lensing.
26: \end{abstract}
27: