1: \begin{abstract}

2: The propagation of light through a Universe of (a) isothermal mass spheres

3: amidst (b) a homogeneous matter component, is considered.

4: We demonstrate by an analytical

5: proof  that as long as a small light bundle passes {\it through}

6: sufficient number of (a) at various

7: impact parameters -  a criterion of great importance -

8: its average

9: convergence will

10: exactly compensate the divergence

11: within  (b).

12: The net effect on the light is statistically the same as if all the matter

13: in (a) is `fully homogenized'.

14: When applying the above ideas towards understanding

15: the angular size of

16: the primary acoustic peaks of the microwave background, however,

17: caution is needed.

18: The reason is that most (by mass) of (a) are in

19: galaxies - their full mass profiles are not

20: sampled by passing light - at least the inner 20 kpc regions of

21: these systems are missed by the majority of rays, while the rest

22: of the rays would map back to unresolvable but magnified,

23: randomly located spots to compensate for the loss in angular size.

24: Therefore, a scanning pair of WMAP beams finds most frequently that

25: the largest temperature difference occurs when each beam is placed

26: at diametrically opposite points of the Dyer-Roeder collapsed sections.

27: This is the {\it mode} magnification, which corresponds to the acoustic

28: {\it peaks}, and is less than the mean (or the

29: homogeneous

30: pre-clumping angular size).

31: Since space was seen to be Euclidean

32: without taking the said adjustment into account, the true density of the

33: Universe should be supercritical.  Our analysis gives

34: $\Omega_m =$ 0.278 $\pm$ 0.040 and $\Omega_{\Lambda} =$ 0.782 $\pm$ 0.040.

35: \end{abstract}

36: