78f28fc857321d3f.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2:         %Motivation
3:         The accurate determination of magnetic phase transitions in electronic systems is an important task of solid state theory.
4:         %Problem
5:         While numerically exact results are readily available for model systems such as the half-filled 3D Hubbard model,
6:         the complexity of real materials requires additional approximations, such as the restriction to certain classes of diagrams in perturbation theory, that reduce the precision with which magnetic properties are described. 
7:         %Method
8:         In this work, we examine the description of magnetic properties in second order perturbation theory, GW, FLEX, and two T-Matrix approximations to numerically exact CT-QMC reference data.
9:         We assess finite-size effects and compare periodic lattice simulations to cluster embedding.
10:         %Results
11:         We find that embedding substantially improves finite size convergence. However, by analyzing different partial summation
12:         methods we find no systematic improvement in the description of magnetic properties, with most methods considered in
13:         this work predicting first-order instead of continuous transitions, leading us to the conclusion that 
14:         %Conclusion
15:         non-perturbative methods are necessary for the accurate determination of magnetic properties and phase transitions.
16:     \end{abstract}
17: