1: \begin{abstract}

2: The hawk--dove game admits two 

3: types of equilibria: an asymmetric pure equilibrium in which players in one population play “hawk'' and players in the other population play ``dove,'' and an 

4: inefficient symmetric  mixed equilibrium, 

5: in which hawks are frequently matched against each other.

6: The existing  

7: literature shows that populations will converge to playing one of the 

8: pure equilibria  from almost any initial state. By contrast, we show that plausible sampling dynamics, in which agents occasionally revise their actions by observing either opponents' behavior or payoffs in a few past interactions, can induce the opposite result:  

9: convergence to one of the inefficient mixed stationary states. 

10: 

11: 

12: \noindent \textbf{Keywords:} Chicken game, learning, evolutionary stability,  payoff sampling dynamics, action sampling dynamics, binomial distributions. \textbf{JEL codes: }C72, C73.

13: \end{abstract}

14: