1: \begin{abstract}
2: We study a family of $H^m$-conforming piecewise polynomials based on
3: artificial neural network, named as the {\it finite neuron method}
4: (FNM),
5: for numerical solution of $2m$-th order partial differential
6: equations in $\mathbb{R}^d$ for any $m,d \geq 1$ and then provide
7: convergence analysis for this method. Given a general domain
8: $\Omega\subset\mathbb R^d$ and a partition $\mathcal
9: T_h$ of $\Omega$, it is still an open problem in general how to
10: construct conforming finite element subspace of $H^m(\Omega)$ that
11: have adequate approximation properties. By using techniques from
12: artificial neural networks, we construct a family of
13: $H^m$-conforming set of functions consisting of piecewise
14: polynomials of degree $k$ for any $k\ge m$ and we further obtain the
15: error estimate when they are applied to solve elliptic boundary
16: value problem of any order in any dimension. For example, the
17: following error estimates between the exact solution $u$ and finite
18: neuron approximation $u_N$ are obtained.
19: $$
20: \|u-u_N\|_{H^m(\Omega)}=\mathcal O(N^{-{1\over 2}-{1\over d}}).
21: $$
22: Discussions will also be given on the difference and relationship
23: between the finite neuron method and finite element methods (FEM). For
24: example, for finite neuron method, the underlying finite element grids
25: are not given a priori and the discrete solution can only be obtained
26: by solving a non-linear and non-convex optimization problem.
27: %
28: Despite of many desirable theoretical properties of the finite
29: neuron method analyzed in the paper, its practical value is a subject
30: of further investigation since the aforementioned underlying
31: non-linear and non-convex optimization problem can be expensive and
32: challenging to solve. For completeness and also convenience to
33: readers, some basic known results and their proofs are also included
34: in this manuscript.
35: \end{abstract}
36: