7eea66c33e5bc536.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2:     We develop a trust-region method for minimizing the sum of a smooth term \(f\) and a nonsmooth term \(h\), both of which can be nonconvex.
3:     Each iteration of our method minimizes a possibly nonconvex model of \(f + h\) in a trust region.
4:     The model coincides with \(f + h\) in value and subdifferential at the center.
5:     We establish global convergence to a first-order stationary point when \(f\) satisfies a smoothness condition that holds, in particular, when it has Lipschitz-continuous gradient, and \(h\) is proper and lower semi-continuous.
6:     The model of \(h\) is required to be proper, lower-semi-continuous and prox-bounded.
7:     Under these weak assumptions, we establish a worst-case \(O(1/\epsilon^2)\) iteration complexity bound that matches the best known complexity bound of standard trust-region methods for smooth optimization.
8:     We detail a special instance, named TR-PG, in which we use a limited-memory quasi-Newton model of \(f\) and compute a step with the proximal gradient method, resulting in a practical proximal quasi-Newton method.
9:     We establish similar convergence properties and complexity bound for a quadratic regularization variant, named R2, and provide an interpretation as a proximal gradient method with adaptive step size for nonconvex problems.
10:     R2 may also be used to compute steps inside the trust-region method, resulting in an implementation named TR-R2.
11:     We describe our Julia implementations and report numerical results on inverse problems from sparse optimization and signal processing.
12:     Both TR-PG and TR-R2 exhibit promising performance and compare favorably with two linesearch proximal quasi-Newton methods based on convex models.
13:   \end{abstract}
14: