1: \begin{abstract}

2: Optimization problems arising in data science have given rise to a number of new derivative-based optimization methods. 

3: Such methods often use standard smoothness assumptions---namely, global Lipschitz continuity of the gradient function---to establish a convergence theory. 

4: Unfortunately, in this work, we show that common optimization problems from data science applications are not globally Lipschitz smooth, nor do they satisfy some more recently developed smoothness conditions in literature. 

5: Instead, we show that such optimization problems are better modeled as having locally Lipschitz continuous gradients. 

6: We then construct explicit examples satisfying this assumption on which existing classes of optimization methods are either unreliable or experience an explosion in evaluation complexity. 

7: In summary, we show that optimization problems arising in data science are particularly difficult to solve, and that there is a need for methods that can reliably and practically solve these problems.

8: \end{abstract}

9: