1: \begin{abstract}

2: %

3: There has been a newly refound interest in press freedom in the face of various

4: global scandals, transformation of media, technological change, obstacles to

5: deliberative democracy, and other factors. Press freedom is frequently used also

6: as an explanatory factor in comparative empirical research. However, validations

7: of existing measurement instruments on press freedom have been far and few

8: between. Given these points, this paper evaluates eight cross-country

9: instruments on press freedom in $147$ countries between 2001 and 2020,

10: replicating an earlier study with a comparable research setup. The methodology

11: is based on principal component analysis and multi-level regression

12: modeling. According to the results, the construct (convergence) validity of the

13: instruments is good; they all measure the same underlying semi-narrow

14: definition for press freedom elaborated in the paper. In addition, any of the

15: indices seems suitable to be used interchangeability in empirical research. Limitations and future research directions are further discussed.

16: %

17: \vspace{5pt}\\ \small\textbf{Keywords}: Media freedom, freedom of expression,

18: freedom of speech, journalism, censorship, harassment, deliberative democracy,

19: comparative research, replication

20: \end{abstract}

21: