1: \begin{abstract}

2: In our Novi Sad conference paper (1999) we described  

3: Dehn type surgeries of the famous Gieseking (1912) hyperbolic ideal 

4: simplex manifold $\cS$, 

5: leading to compact fundamental domain $\cS(k)$, $k = 2, 3, \dots$ 

6: with singularity geodesics 

7: of rotation order $k$, but as later turned out with cone angle $2(k-1)/k$. We computed also the volume of $S(k)$, tending to zero 

8: if $k$ goes to infinity. That time we naively thought 

9: that we obtained orbifolds with the above surprising property.

10: 

11: As the reviewer of Math. Rev., Kevin P. Scannell (MR1770996 (2001g:57030)) rightly remarked, 

12: ``this is in conflict with the well-known theorem of D.~A. Kazhdan and 

13: G.~A. Margulis (1968)

14: and with the work of  Thurston, describing the geometric convergence 

15: of orbifolds under large Dehn fillings".

16: 

17: In this paper we refresh our previous publication. Correctly, we 

18: obtained cone manifolds (for $k > 2$), as A.~D.~Mednykh and V.~S.~Petrov (2006) 

19: kindly pointed out. We complete our discussion and derive the above cone manifold 

20: series (Gies.1 and Gies.2) in two geometrically equivalent form, 

21: by the half turn symmetry of any ideal simplex. Moreover we obtain a 

22: second orbifold series (Gies.3 and 4), tending 

23: to the regular ideal simplex as the original Gieseking manifold.  

24: %

25: \end{abstract}