81a5dcc16d59fc6e.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: The successive perturbative estimates of the
3: pressure of QCD at high temperature $T$  show no sign of 
4: convergence,  unless the coupling constant $g$ is unrealistically small.
5: Exploiting known results of an
6: effective field theory which separates hard (order $2\pi T$) and soft (order
7: $gT$) contributions, we explore the accuracy of simple resummations which
8: at a given loop order systematically treat hard contributions
9: strictly perturbatively, but soft contributions without truncations.
10: This turns out to improve significantly the two-loop and the three-loop results
11: in that both remain below the ideal-gas value, and the
12: degree of renormalization
13: scale dependence decreases as one goes from two to three loop order,
14: whereas it increases in the conventional perturbative results.
15: Including the four-loop logarithms recently obtained by Kajantie et al.,
16: we find that this trend continues and that with a particular 
17: sublogarithmic constant the untruncated four-loop
18: result is close to the three-loop result, which itself agrees
19: well with available lattice results down to
20: temperatures of about $2.5T_c$.
21: We also investigate the possibility of optimization
22: by using a variational (``screened'')
23: perturbation theory in the effective  theory.
24: At two loops, this gives a result below the
25: ideal gas value, and also closer to
26: lattice results than the recent two-loop hard-thermal-loop-screened result
27: of Andersen et al.
28: While at three-loop order the gap equation of
29: dimensionally reduced screened perturbation
30: theory does not have a solution in QCD, this is
31: remedied upon inclusion of the four-loop logarithms.
32: \end{abstract}
33: