1: \begin{abstract}

2: \baselineskip=12pt

3: 

4: \noindent The composite likelihood (CL) is amongst the computational methods used for estimation of the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) in the context of bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Its advantage is that the likelihood can  be derived conveniently under the assumption of independence between the random effects, but there has not been a clear analysis of the  merit or necessity  of this method. 

5: For synthesis of diagnostic test accuracy studies, a copula mixed model  has been proposed  in the biostatistics literature.

6: This general model includes  the GLMM 

7:  as a special case and  can also  allow for flexible dependence modelling, different from assuming simple linear correlation structures, normality and tail independence in the joint tails. A maximum likelihood  (ML) method, which is based  on evaluating the bi-dimensional integrals of the likelihood with  quadrature methods has been proposed, and in fact   it eases any  computational difficulty that might be caused by the double integral in the likelihood function. 

8: Both methods are thoroughly examined with extensive simulations and illustrated with data of  a published meta-analysis. It is shown that the ML method has no non-convergence issues or computational difficulties and at the same time  allows estimation of the dependence between study-specific sensitivity and specificity  and thus prediction via summary receiver operating curves.

9: \\\\

10: \noindent {\it Keywords:} {Copula mixed model; diagnostic odds ratio; generalized linear mixed model; sensitivity/specificity; SROC.}

11: \end{abstract}

12: