1: \begin{abstract}

2: The error of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) using kernel for particle-based approximation

3: mainly comes from smoothing and integration errors.  

4: The choice of kernels has a significant impact on the numerical accuracy, stability and computational efficiency. 

5: At present, the most popular kernels such as B-spline, truncated Gaussian (for compact support), Wendland kernels have 2nd-order smoothing error 

6: and Wendland kernel becomes mainstream in SPH community as its stability and accuracy.

7: Due to the fact that the particle distribution after relaxation can achieve fast convergence of integration error respected to support radius, 

8: it is logical to choose kernels with higher-order smoothing error to improve the numerical accuracy.

9: In this paper, 

10: the error of 4th-order Laguerre-Wendland kernel proposed by Litvinov et al. \cite{litvinov2015towards} is revisited and  

11: another 4th-order truncated Laguerre-Gauss kernel is further analyzed and considered to replace the widely used Wendland kernel.

12: The proposed kernel has following three properties: 

13: One is that it avoids the pair-instability problem during the relaxation process, unlike the original truncated Gaussian kernel,  

14: and achieves much less relaxation residue than Wendland and Laguerre-Wendland kernels;

15: One is the truncated compact support size is the same as the non-truncated compact support of Wendland kernel, 

16: which leads to both kernels' computational efficiency at the same level;

17: Another is that the truncation error of this kernel is much less than that of Wendland kernel.

18: Furthermore,

19: a comprehensive set of $2D$ and $3D$ benchmark cases on Eulerian SPH for fluid dynamics 

20: and total Lagrangian SPH for solid dynamics validate the considerably improved numerical accuracy 

21: by using truncated Laguerre-Gauss kernel without introducing extra computational effort.

22: 

23: \end{abstract}

24: