1: \begin{abstract}

2: In this paper, we consider a frequency-based portfolio optimization problem with $m \geq 2$ assets when the expected logarithmic growth (ELG) rate of wealth is used as the performance metric. 

3: With the aid of the notion called \textit{dominant asset}, it is known that the optimal ELG level is achieved by investing all available funds on that asset.

4: However, such an ``all-in" strategy is arguably too risky to implement in practice. 

5: Motivated by this issue, we study the case where the portfolio weights are chosen in a rather \textit{ad-hoc} manner and a buy-and-hold strategy is subsequently used.

6: Then we show that, if the underlying portfolio contains a dominant asset, buy and hold on that specific asset is asymptotically log-optimal with a sublinear rate of convergence. 

7: This result also extends to the scenario where a trader either does not have a probabilistic model for the returns or does not trust a model obtained from historical data. 

8: To be more specific, we show that if a market contains a dominant asset, buy and hold a \textit{market} portfolio involving nonzero weights for each asset is asymptotically log-optimal. 

9: %Hence, the  probabilistic model is not needed.

10: Additionally, this paper also includes a conjecture regarding the property called \textit{high-frequency maximality}. That is, in the absence of transaction costs,   high-frequency rebalancing is \textit{unbeatable} in the ELG sense. Support for the conjecture, involving a lemma for a weak version of the conjecture,  is provided. 

11: This conjecture, if true, enables us to  improve the log-optimality result obtained previously. Finally, a result that indicates a way regarding an issue about \textit{when} should one to rebalance their portfolio, if needed, is also provided.

12: Examples, some involving simulations with historical data, are also provided along the way to illustrate the~theory.

13: \end{abstract}