1: \begin{abstract}

2: A graph $X$ is said to be {\it distance--balanced} if for any edge

3: $uv$ of $X$, the number of vertices closer to $u$ than to $v$ is

4: equal to the number of vertices closer to $v$ than to $u$. A graph

5: $X$ is said to be {\it strongly distance--balanced} if for any edge

6: $uv$ of $X$ and any integer $k$, the number of vertices at distance

7: $k$ from $u$ and at distance $k+1$ from $v$ is equal to the number

8: of vertices at distance $k+1$ from $u$ and at distance $k$ from $v$.

9: Obviously, being distance--balanced is metrically a weaker condition

10: than being strongly distance--balanced. In this paper, a connection

11: between symmetry properties of graphs and the metric property of

12: being (strongly) distance--balanced is explored. In particular, it

13: is proved that every vertex--transitive graph is strongly

14: distance--balanced.

15: 

16: A graph is said to be {\em semisymmetric} if its automorphism group

17: acts transitively on its edge set, but does not act transitively on

18: its vertex set. An infinite family of semisymmetric graphs, which

19: are not distance--balanced, is constructed.

20: 

21: Finally, we give a complete classification of strongly

22: distance--balanced graphs for the following infinite families of

23: generalized Petersen graphs: $\GP(n,2)$, $\GP(5k+1,k)$, $\GP(3k\pm

24: 3,k)$, and $\GP(2k+2,k)$.

25: 

26: \end{abstract}

27: