1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: The long-standing challenge of creating a Milky Way-like disk galaxy from cosmological simulations has motivated significant developments in both numerical methods and physical models. We investigate these two fundamental aspects in a new comparison project using a set of cosmological hydrodynamic simulations of a Milky Way-size galaxy. In this study, we focus on the comparison of two particle-based hydrodynamics methods: an improved smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) code {\Gadget}, and a Lagrangian Meshless Finite-Mass (MFM) code {\Gizmo}. All the simulations in this paper use the same initial conditions and physical models, which include star formation,  ``energy-driven'' outflows, metal-dependent cooling, stellar evolution and metal enrichment. We find that both numerical schemes produce a late-type galaxy with extended gaseous and stellar disks. However, notable differences are present in a wide range of galaxy properties and their evolution, including  star formation history, gas content, disk structure and kinematics. Compared to {\Gizmo}, {\Gadget} simulation produced a larger fraction of cold, dense gas at high redshift which fuels rapid star formation and results in a higher stellar mass by $20\%$ and a lower gas fraction by $10\%$ at $z = 0$, and the resulting gas disk is smoother and more coherent in rotation due to damping of turbulent motion by the numerical viscosity in SPH,  in contrast to the {\Gizmo} simulation which shows more prominent spiral structure. Given its better convergence properties and lower computational cost, we argue that MFM method is a promising alternative to SPH in cosmological hydrodynamic simulations.

4: 

5: 

6: \end{abstract}

7: