1: \begin{abstract}

2: Both coronal plumes and network jets are rooted in network lanes.

3: The relationship between the two, however, has yet to be addressed.

4: For this purpose, we perform an observational analysis using

5:     images acquired with the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) 171\,\AA\ passband to follow the evolution of coronal plumes,

6:     the observations taken by the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS) slit-jaw 1330\,\AA\ to study the network jets,

7:     and the line-of-sight magnetograms taken by the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) to overview the the photospheric magnetic features in the regions.

8: Four regions in the network lanes are identified, and labeled ``R1--R4''.

9: We find that coronal plumes are clearly seen only in ``R1''\&''R2'' but not in ``R3''\&``R4'',

10:     even though network jets abound in all these regions.

11: Furthermore, while magnetic features in all these regions are dominated by positive polarity, they are more compact (suggesting stronger convergence) in ``R1''\&``R2'' than that in ``R3''\&``R4''.

12: We develop an automated method to identify and track the network jets in the regions.

13: We find that the network jets rooted in ``R1''\&``R2'' are higher and faster than that in ``R3''\&``R4'',

14:     indicating that network regions producing stronger coronal plumes also tend to produce more dynamic network jets.

15: We suggest that the stronger convergence in ``R1''\&``R2'' might provide a condition for faster shocks and/or more small-scale magnetic reconnection events that power more dynamic network jets and coronal plumes.

16: \end{abstract}

17: