1: \begin{abstract}

2: We study a stochastic model of anonymous influence with conformist and

3: anti-conformist individuals. Each agent with a `yes' or `no' initial opinion on

4: a certain issue can change his opinion due to social influence. We consider

5: anonymous influence, which depends on the number of agents having a certain

6: opinion, but not on their identity. An individual is conformist/anti-conformist

7: if his probability of saying `yes' increases/decreases with the number of `yes'-agents. 

8: We focus on three classes of aggregation rules (pure conformism, pure

9: anti-conformism, and mixed aggregation rules) and examine two types of society

10: (without, and with mixed agents).  For both types we provide a complete

11: qualitative analysis of convergence, i.e., identify all absorbing classes and

12: conditions for their occurrence. Also the pure case with infinitely many

13: individuals is studied. We show that, as expected, the presence of

14: anti-conformists in a society brings polarization and instability: polarization

15: in two groups, fuzzy polarization (i.e., with blurred frontiers), cycles,

16: periodic classes, as well as more or less chaotic situations where at any time

17: step the set of `yes'-agents can be any subset of the society. Surprisingly, the

18: presence of anti-conformists may also lead to opinion reversal: a majority group

19: of conformists with a stable opinion can evolve by a cascade phenomenon towards

20: the opposite opinion, and remains in this state.

21: 

22: 

23: \end{abstract}

24: