1: \begin{abstract}

2: Cauchy's contribution to the foundations of analysis is often viewed

3: through the lens of developments that occurred some decades later,

4: namely the formalisation of analysis on the basis of the epsilon-delta

5: doctrine in the context of an Archimedean continuum.  What does one

6: see if one refrains from viewing Cauchy as if he had read Weierstrass

7: already?  One sees, with Felix Klein, a parallel thread for the

8: development of analysis, in the context of an infinitesimal-enriched

9: continuum.  One sees, with Emile Borel, the seeds of the theory of

10: rates of growth of functions as developed by Paul du Bois-Reymond.

11: One sees, with E.~G.~Bj\"orling, an infinitesimal definition of the

12: criterion of uniform convergence.  Cauchy's foundational stance is

13: hereby reconsidered.

14: \end{abstract}

15: