1: \begin{abstract}

2: 	In the analysis of high dimensional regression models, there are two important objectives:

3: statistical estimation and variable selection. In literature, most works focus on either optimal estimation, e.g.,

4: minimax $L_2$ error, or optimal selection behavior, e.g., minimax Hamming loss. However in this study,

5: we investigate the subtle interplay between the estimation accuracy and selection behavior.

6: Our result shows that an estimator's $L_2$ error rate critically depends on its performance of 

7: type I error control. Essentially, the minimax convergence rate of false discovery rate over all rate-minimax

8: estimators is a polynomial of the true sparsity ratio. This result helps us to characterize the

9: false positive control of rate-optimal estimators under different sparsity regimes. More specifically,

10: under near-linear sparsity, the number of yielded false positives always explodes to infinity under worst scenario,

11: but the false discovery rate still converges to 0; under linear sparsity, even the false discovery rate

12: doesn't asymptotically converge to 0. On the other side, in order to asymptotically eliminate all false 

13: discoveries, the estimator must be sub-optimal in terms of its convergence rate.

14: This work attempts to offer rigorous analysis on the incompatibility phenomenon between selection consistency and rate-minimaxity observed in the high dimensional regression literature.

15: \end{abstract}

16: