1: \begin{abstract}

2: Symplectic integrators have made it possible to study the long-term evolution of planetary systems with direct $N$-body simulations.

3: In this paper we reassess the accuracy of such simulations by running a convergence test on 20~Myr integrations of the Solar System using various symplectic integrators.

4: We find that the specific choice of metric for determining a simulation's accuracy is important. 

5: Only looking at metrics related to integrals of motions such as the energy error can overestimate the accuracy of a method.

6: As one specific example, we show that symplectic correctors do not improve the accuracy of secular frequencies compared to the standard Wisdom-Holman method without symplectic correctors, despite the fact that the energy error is three orders of magnitudes smaller.

7: We present a framework to trace the origin of this apparent paradox to one term in the shadow Hamiltonian.

8: Specifically, we find a term that leads to negligible contributions to the energy error but introduces non-oscillatory errors that result in artificial periastron precession.

9: This term is the dominant error when determining secular frequencies of the system.

10: We show that higher order symplectic methods such as the Wisdom-Holman method with a modified kernel or the SABAC family of integrators perform significantly better in secularly evolving systems because they remove this specific term.

11: \end{abstract}

12: