1: \begin{abstract}

2: 

3: Recent advancements in data-to-text generation largely take on the form of neural end-to-end systems. 

4: %VD: Coherence??? do you mean surface fluency is better in E2E compared to a pipeline system?

5: Efforts have been dedicated to improving text generation systems by changing the order of training samples in a process known as \emph{curriculum learning}.

6: %As such, efforts are largely being put into designing better generative modeling of data and text and optimizing the training process. 

7: Past research

8: %VD: research as mass noun, no plural

9: %VD: I don't see how this contrasts with the first sentence. Need to point out a problem with systems that don't do curriculum learning and then say that CL solves that aspect. Maybe say what curriculum learning is, as not every reader might be familiar with it.

10: on sequence-to-sequence learning showed that \emph{curriculum learning} helps to improve both the performance and convergence speed. 

11: In this work, we delve into the same idea surrounding the training samples consisting of structured data and text pairs, where at each update, the curriculum framework selects training samples based on the model's competence.

12: Specifically, we experiment with various difficulty metrics and put forward a \emph{soft edit distance metric}

13: % \footnote{The code will be released upon acceptance.} 

14: for ranking training samples.

15: Our benchmarks show faster convergence speed where training time is reduced by $38.7$\% and performance is boosted by $4.84$ BLEU.

16: % VD: re-write, too wordy.

17: %The framework can be adopted into existing data-to-text system pipeline, at the surface realization step. 

18: 

19: \end{abstract}

20: