1: \begin{abstract} 

2: Two important enhanced sampling algorithms, simulated (ST) and 

3: parallel (PT) tempering, are commonly used when ergodic simulations 

4: may be hard to achieve, e.g, due to a phase space separated by large 

5: free-energy barriers.  

6: This is so for systems around first-order phase transitions, a case 

7: still not fully explored with such approaches in the literature. 

8: In this contribution we make a comparative study between the PT and 

9: ST for the Ising (a lattice-gas in the fluid language) and the BEG 

10: (a lattice-gas with vacancies) models at phase transition regimes.

11: We show that although the two methods are equivalent in the limit of 

12: sufficiently long simulations, the PT is more advantageous than the 

13: ST with respect to all the analysis performed: 

14: convergence towards the stationarity; 

15: frequency of tunneling between phases at the coexistence; 

16: and decay of time-displaced correlation functions of thermodynamic 

17: quantities.

18: Qualitative arguments for why one may expect better results from 

19: the PT than the ST near phase transitions conditions are also 

20: presented.

21: \end{abstract}