8aee34626da51155.tex
1: \begin{abstract}
2: 
3: The lensing convergence measurable with future CMB surveys like CMB-S4 will be highly correlated with the clustering observed by deep photometric large scale 
4: structure (LSS) surveys such as the LSST, with cross-correlation coefficient as high as 95\%. 
5: This will enable use of sample variance cancellation techniques to determine cosmological parameters, and use of cross-correlation measurements to break parameter degeneracies. 
6: Assuming large sky overlap between CMB-S4 and LSST,
7: we show that a joint analysis of CMB-S4 lensing and LSST clustering can yield very tight constraints on the matter amplitude $\sigma_8(z)$, halo bias, and $f_\mathrm{NL}$, competitive with the best stage IV experiment predictions, but using complementary methods, which may carry different and possibly lower systematics. 
8: Having no sky overlap between experiments degrades the precision of $\sigma_8(z)$ by a factor of 20, and that of $f_\mathrm{NL}$ by a factor of 1.5 to 2.
9: Without CMB lensing, the precision always degrades by an order of magnitude or more, showing that a joint analysis is critical.
10: Our results also suggest that CMB lensing in combination with 
11: LSS photometric surveys is a competitive probe 
12: of the evolution of structure in the redshift range $z\simeq 1-7$, probing a regime that is not well tested observationally.
13: We explore predictions against other surveys and experiment configurations, finding that wide patches with maximal sky overlap between CMB and LSS surveys are most powerful for $\sigma_8(z)$ and $f_\mathrm{NL}$.
14: 
15: 
16: \end{abstract}
17: