1: \begin{abstract} Singleton et al (2009) have  argued that the flux of  pulsars measured at 1400 MHz  shows an apparent violation of the inverse-square law with distance ($r$), and instead the flux  scales as  $1/r$. They deduced this from the fact that  the convergence error obtained in reconstructing the luminosity function of pulsars using an iterative maximum likelihood procedure is about  $10^5$ times larger for a distance exponent of two (corresponding to the inverse-square law) compared to an  exponent of one. When we applied the same  technique to this pulsar dataset with two different values for the trial luminosity function in the zeroth iteration, we find that neither of them can reproduce a value of $10^5$ for the ratio of the convergence error between these distance exponents. We then reconstruct the differential pulsar luminosity function using Lynden-Bell's $C^{-}$ method after positing both inverse-linear and  inverse-square scalings with distance. We show that this method cannot help in discerning between the two exponents. Finally, when we tried to estimate the power-law exponent  with a Bayesian regression procedure, we do not get a best-fit value of one for the distance exponent. The model residuals obtained from our fitting procedure  are larger for the inverse-linear law compared to the  inverse-square law. Moreover, the observed pulsar flux cannot be parameterized  only by  power-law functions of  distance, period, and period derivative. 

2:  Therefore, we conclude from our analysis using multiple methods that there is no evidence that the pulsar radio flux at 1400 MHz violates the inverse-square law or that the flux scales inversely with distance.

3: \end{abstract}

4: