1: \begin{abstract}

2: Multi- or many-objective evolutionary algorithms(MOEAs), especially the decomposition-based MOEAs have been widely concerned in recent years.

3: The decomposition-based MOEAs emphasize convergence and diversity in a simple model and have made a great success in dealing with theoretical and practical multi- or many-objective optimization problems.

4: In this paper, we focus on update strategies of the decomposition-based MOEAs, and their criteria for comparing solutions.

5: Three disadvantages of the decomposition-based MOEAs  with local update strategies and several existing criteria for comparing solutions are analyzed and discussed.

6: And a global loop update strategy and two hybrid criteria are suggested.

7: Subsequently, an evolutionary algorithm with the global loop update is  implemented

8: and compared to several of the best multi- or many-objective optimization algorithms on two famous

9: unconstraint test suites with up to 15 objectives.

10: Experimental results demonstrate that unlike evolutionary algorithms with local update strategies,

11: the population of our algorithm does not degenerate at any generation of its evolution,

12: which guarantees the diversity of the resulting population.

13: In addition, our algorithm wins in most instances of the two test suites,

14: indicating that it is very competitive in terms of convergence and diversity.

15: Running results of our algorithm with different criteria for comparing solutions are also compared.

16: Their differences are very significant, indicating that the performance of our algorithm is affected by the criterion it adopts.

17: 

18: 

19: 

20: 

21: \end{abstract}