1: \begin{abstract}

2: Recent developments of high-order CCM have been to extend existing formalism 

3: and codes to $s \ge \frac 12$ for both the ground and excited states, and independently

4: to ``generalised'' expectation values for a wide range of  one- and two-body spin operators.

5: An advantage of the CCM is that the Goldstone linked-cluster theorem

6: is obeyed at all levels of approximation and so it provides results in the infinite 

7: lattice limit $N \rightarrow \infty$ from the outset. However, recent results have 

8: also shown that the CCM can provide exact (symmetry-breaking)

9: results for  the spin-half linear-chain $J_1$--$J_2$ at the  Majumdar-Ghosh

10: point $J_2/J_1=0.5$ by identifying special solutions of the CCM equations for the usual

11: N\'eel model state. Interestingly, the CCM provides exact (non-symmetry-breaking) results 

12: for systems in which small magnetic clusters become de-coupled from each other when the bonds 

13: connecting them tend to zero. These exact results involve the identification of ``special solutions''

14: of the CCM equations for the N\'eel state. An example of this is given by a spin-half system with 

15: nearest-neighbour bonds for an underlying lattice corresponding to the magnetic material 

16: CaV$_4$O$_9$ (CAVO) in which one of the two different types of bonds on the lattice tend 

17: to zero. Larger finite-sized systems may be considered 

18: by appropriate choice of the unit cell and the bonds on it. We show 

19: here that exact diagonalisation results for ground-state energy and excitation energy

20: gap for the spin-half and spin-one linear Heisenberg model on chains of length up 

21: to $N=12$ sites for $s=1/2$ and $N=6$ sites for $s=1$ 

22: with periodic boundary conditions are reproduced exactly using high-order CCM

23: via this ``brute-force'' approach; i.e., one in which none of the translational or 

24: point-group symmetries of the finite lattice are used. 

25: \end{abstract}

26: